LATEST POSTS
-

Why Some Incident Investigations Make the Next Incident More Likely
CONTINUE READING: Why Some Incident Investigations Make the Next Incident More LikelyPrevention begins with understanding that your incident investigations can unintentionally increase future risk. When post-mortem processes focus on assigning blame or constructing tidy narratives, they often overlook systemic weaknesses. Labeling an issue as human error shuts down inquiry, while hindsight bias distorts the actual conditions under pressure. A mid-sized SaaS firm, for example, saw recurring…
-

Are Your Leading Indicators Predicting Risk-or Just Counting Work?
CONTINUE READING: Are Your Leading Indicators Predicting Risk-or Just Counting Work?Just because your team logs hundreds of security tickets weekly doesn’t mean you’re safer-many leading indicators merely reflect activity, not actual risk reduction. You track scans completed, patches applied, or training sessions finished, but these metrics often measure effort, not effectiveness. A mid-sized SaaS firm once doubled its incident response drills yet saw no improvement…
-

Why Good Supervisors Sometimes Make Bad Safety Decisions
CONTINUE READING: Why Good Supervisors Sometimes Make Bad Safety DecisionsMost experienced supervisors have made a safety compromise that later seemed indefensible, even to themselves. You follow protocols daily, train your team rigorously, and prioritize compliance-yet serious incidents often follow small, rationalized deviations. A momentary choice to bypass a lockout procedure, delay a repair, or ignore a near-miss can cascade into preventable harm. These lapses…
